You also can be a part of it!
China’s state-run propaganda outlets, including Xinhua News Agency, People’s Daily, China Media Group (CCTV/CGTN), and the Global Times, often portray Tibet’s booming tourism industry as evidence of “modernization” and “national rejuvenation”. According to China Daily, in the first half of 2023, Tibet received over 24 million tourists, a 41% year-on-year rise generating 26 billion yuan ($3.6 billion). Foreign visitors surged by 494% to 30,455, while domestic tourism drove the bulk of growth with 24.21 million visits. Generating about $4.2 billion in revenue, highlighting what Beijing tout Tibet as a model figure as proofs that modern prosperity has reached the plateau.
Tibet’s tourism surge is accelerating ecological breakdown and cultural erosion across one of the world’s most fragile environments. Beijing’s so-called “development” is a form of extractive statecraft. Through large-scale infrastructure projects, population transfers, and state-orchestrated performances, policies, Tibet is being economically and strategically integrate into China. What is presented as progress often benefits outsiders, marginalizes local communities, and undermines Tibetan cultural and ecological sustainability. The costs are borne not only by Tibetans but also has a huge implication for Tibet fragile ecology.
Massive construction of highways, railways, airports, and hydropower dams, many serving both civilian and military purposes, has damaged permafrost, fragmented alpine ecosystems, and displaced local communities. These infrastructure projects, which reinforce Tibet’s tourism boom, are simultaneously eroding the landscapes they claim to celebrate.
Moreover, stretching 1,956 km across the Tibet Plateau, the Qinghai-Tibet Railway links Xining and Lhasa, ending Tibet’s railway-less history and becoming the world’s highest railway. While hailed as an engineering marvel, it has also fragmented alpine habitats, disrupted wildlife migration patterns, and altered local ecosystems. A 2023 Nature Ecology & Evolution study found that vegetation productivity dropped significantly within five kilometers of the railway corridor.
Construction across the plateau has also destabilized permafrost layers, triggering landslides and soil erosion that could persist for decades. China is significantly expanding its aviation infrastructure in Tibet as part of its broader strategy to enhance connectivity, economic integration, and military readiness in the region. The government’s connectivity drive continues with new airports in Ngari, Nyingchi, and Shigatse, often built without transparent environmental impact assessments. For Beijing, such projects symbolize modernization; for Tibet’s ecosystems, they mark slow disintegration.
Tourists as Unintentional Ecological Vandals
Tourism has become the Chinese state’s preferred tool for economic control and cultural reshaping. Millions of domestic tourists, many visiting Tibet for leisure or spiritual tourism, inadvertently act as agents of ecological disruption.
Many Chinese visit Tibet as tourists, with a significant number eventually settling in Lhasa and working in local businesses. For these migrants, Tibet serves primarily as a place to earn money and support families in China, rather than as a home. This migration reshapes the city’s demographics and economy, reinforcing broader patterns of population-driven economic dependency.
Located at 4,718 meters in the Tibet Autonomous Region, Namtso Lake is the world’s highest saltwater lake and one of Tibet’s holiest natural sites. Dawa Dorje, a leader from Dabu Village, recalled that nomads once moved freely between pastures with little adverse impact for ecology. “After 2000, tourism surged garbage littered the grasslands, and vehicles drove across them, putting huge pressure on the environment.” Today, vehicles continue to navigate alpine meadows that take decades to regenerate.
Viral videos have highlighted concerning and insensitive behaviors among some Chinese tourists in Tibet, including climbing sacred stupas, disturbing wildlife, and littering in pristine environments like Namtso Lake. These actions have sparked widespread criticism and raised questions about the sustainability of Tibet's tourism boom.
The “Rising Dragon” fireworks display in Gyantse, orchestrated by Chinese artist Cai Guo-Qiang and sponsored by Arc’teryx, serves as a clear illustration of state-backed spectacle that prioritizes tourism promotion and political image over Tibet’s fragile environment. Approved by the Chinese authorities despite the ecological sensitivity of the region, the event caused pollution, disturbed local wildlife, and highlighted how sacred and natural sites are exploited for propaganda and commercial gain. The display provoked widespread outrage among Chinese netizens and the international community, who criticized it for environmental destruction, cultural insensitivity, and the commodification of Tibet’s heritage. Both Cai and Arc’teryx issued apologies, while local authorities launched an investigation, highlighting how cultural and natural sites are leveraged for propaganda and commercial gain.
Tourism as Statecraft
Beijing’s commercialization and securitization of Tibet is most striking on Lhasa’s Barkhor Street and before the Potala Palace, once sacred centers of spiritual devotion. Today, these sites are overrun with tourists in imitation Tibetan costumes, snapping photos for social media, live streaming, reducing centuries old religious spaces to a staged ethnic theme park. The narrow circumambulation route around Barkhor, historically reserved for kora, is now so congested that elderly Tibetans struggle to complete their devotional circuits, gasping amid the crush of visitors. Monks and nuns, who once walked these paths in quiet meditation, are routinely interrupted and treated as props; “They make us part of their pictures, not part of our faith,” one monk lamented.
The streets of Barkhor are also saturated with surveillance cameras, three layers of security checkpoints, and intrusive inspections, everyone is subjected to strict security protocols. Even domestic Chinese tourists have voiced frustration over the heavy securitization, which disrupts the flow of pilgrimage and leisure alike.
The cultural erosion is inseparable from economic exploitation. According to a Tibetan Dhoundup working in Lhasa, “The more tourists come, the higher the prices rise, yet locals earn less.” Skyrocketing rents and food costs have pushed residents out of central Lhasa, while profits are funneled to state linked or Chinese owned enterprises. Tibetans are left with an “expenditure shortage” a widening gap between the soaring cost of living and stagnant wages a blunt illustration of how Beijing’s tourism boom extracts wealth, commodifies culture, and imposes heavy state control, leaving the very people it claims to benefit economically and symbolically marginalized.
China’s mass population transfers into Tibet, often framed as demographic development, function effectively as a colonial tool of control over the region. The situation is compounded by tourism: the number of visitors now exceeds the local Tibetan population by four times, placing unprecedented strain on Tibet’s fragile environment. This dual pressure, massive population influx and unchecked tourism is profoundly unsustainable, threatening both ecological stability and the cultural integrity of the region.
Tibet’s tourism expansion is not merely unsustainable; it is structurally exploitative. Policies and infrastructure projects disproportionately benefit outsiders while marginalizing local communities and encroaching upon sacred cultural sites. The overwhelming influx of tourists, coupled with large-scale development, has commodified Tibetan heritage, disrupted traditional livelihoods, and intensified environmental degradation.
Reversing these trends requires more than incremental adjustments: tourism and development in Tibet must prioritize the rights, well-being, and economic participation of Tibetans. Visitor numbers at ecologically and culturally sensitive sites should be strictly limited, cultural and environmental protections rigorously enforced, and all infrastructure projects designed to be low-impact and sustainable. Without decisive measures, Tibet faces further cultural commodification, deepening social inequalities, and irreversible ecological damage threats that are both preventable and politically consequential.
